{"database": "24ways", "table": "articles", "is_view": false, "human_description_en": "where author_slug = \"brucelawson\"", "rows": [[177, "HTML5: Tool of Satan, or Yule of Santa?", "It would lead to unseasonal arguments to discuss the title of this piece here, and the arguments are as indigestible as the fourth turkey curry of the season, so we\u2019ll restrict our article to the practical rather than the philosophical: what HTML5 can you reasonably expect to be able to use reliably cross-browser in the early months of 2010?\n\nThe answer is that you can use more than you might think, due to the seasonal tinsel of feature-detection and using the sparkly pixie-dust of IE-only VML (but used in a way that won\u2019t damage your Elf).\n\nCanvas\n\ncanvas is a 2D drawing API that defines a blank area of the screen of arbitrary size, and allows you to draw on it using JavaScript. The pictures can be animated, such as in this canvas mashup of Wolfenstein 3D and Flickr. (The difference between canvas and SVG is that SVG uses vector graphics, so is infinitely scalable. It also keeps a DOM, whereas canvas is just pixels so you have to do all your own book-keeping yourself in JavaScript if you want to know where aliens are on screen, or do collision detection.)\n\nPreviously, you needed to do this using Adobe Flash or Java applets, requiring plugins and potentially compromising keyboard accessibility. Canvas drawing is supported now in Opera, Safari, Chrome and Firefox. The reindeer in the corner is, of course, Internet Explorer, which currently has zero support for canvas (or SVG, come to that).\n\nNow, don\u2019t pull a face like all you\u2019ve found in your Yuletide stocking is a mouldy satsuma and a couple of nuts\u2014that\u2019s not the end of the story. Canvas was originally an Apple proprietary technology, and Internet Explorer had a similar one called Vector Markup Language which was submitted to the W3C for standardisation in 1998 but which, unlike canvas, was not blessed with retrospective standardisation.\n\nWhat you need, then, is some way for Internet Explorer to translate canvas to VML on-the-fly, while leaving the other, more standards-compliant browsers to use the HTML5. And such a way exists\u2014it\u2019s a JavaScript library called excanvas. It\u2019s downloadable from http://code.google.com/p/explorercanvas/ and it\u2019s simple to include it via a conditional comment in the head for IE:\n\n\n\nSimply include this, and your canvas will be natively supported in the modern browsers (and the library won\u2019t even be downloaded) whereas IE will suddenly render your canvas using its own VML engine. Be sure, however, to check it carefully, as the IE JavaScript engine isn\u2019t so fast and you\u2019ll need to be sure that performance isn\u2019t too degraded to use.\n\nForms\n\nSince the beginning of the Web, developers have been coding forms, and then writing JavaScript to check whether an input is a correctly formed email address, URL, credit card number or conforms to some other pattern. The cumulative labour of the world\u2019s developers over the last 15 years makes whizzing round in a sleigh and delivering presents seem like popping to the corner shop in comparison.\n\nWith HTML5, that\u2019s all about to change. As Yaili began to explore on Day 3, a host of new attributes to the input element provide built-in validation for email address formats (input type=email), URLs (input type=url), any pattern that can be expressed with a JavaScript-syntax regex (pattern=\"[0-9][A-Z]{3}\") and the like. New attributes such as required, autofocus, input type=number min=3 max=50 remove much of the tedious JavaScript from form validation.\n\nOther, really exciting input types are available (see all input types). The datalist is reminiscent of a select box, but allows the user to enter their own text if they don\u2019t want to choose one of the pre-defined options. input type=range is rendered as a slider, while input type=date pops up a date picker, all natively in the browser with no JavaScript required at all.\n\nCurrently, support is most complete in an experimental implementation in Opera and a number of the new attributes in Webkit-based browsers. But don\u2019t let that stop you! The clever thing about the specification of the new Web Forms is that all the new input types are attributes (rather than elements). input defaults to input type=text, so if a browser doesn\u2019t understand a new HTML5 type, it gracefully degrades to a plain text input.\n\nSo where does that leave validation in those browsers that don\u2019t support Web Forms? The answer is that you don\u2019t retire your pre-existing JavaScript validation just yet, but you leave it as a fallback after doing some feature detection. To detect whether (say) input type=email is supported, you make a new input type=email with JavaScript but don\u2019t add it to the page. Then, you interrogate your new element to find out what its type attribute is. If it\u2019s reported back as \u201cemail\u201d, then the browser supports the new feature, so let it do its work and don\u2019t bring in any JavaScript validation. If it\u2019s reported back as \u201ctext\u201d, it\u2019s fallen back to the default, indicating that it\u2019s not supported, so your code should branch to your old validation routines. Alternatively, use the small (7K) Modernizr library which will do this work for you and give you JavaScript booleans like Modernizr.inputtypes[email] set to true or false.\n\nSo what does this buy you? Well, first and foremost, you\u2019re future-proofing your code for that time when all browsers support these hugely useful additions to forms. Secondly, you buy a usability and accessibility win. Although it\u2019s tempting to style the stuffing out of your form fields (which can, incidentally, lead to madness), whatever your branding people say, it\u2019s better to leave forms as close to the browser defaults as possible. A browser\u2019s slider and date pickers will be the same across different sites, making it much more comprehensible to users. And, by using native controls rather than faking sliders and date pickers with JavaScript, your forms are much more likely to be accessible to users of assistive technology.\n\nHTML5 DOCTYPE\n\nYou can use the new DOCTYPE !doctype html now and \u2013 hey presto \u2013 you\u2019re writing HTML5, as it\u2019s pretty much a superset of HTML4. There are some useful advantages to doing this. The first is that the HTML5 validator (I use http://html5.validator.nu) also validates ARIA information, whereas the HTML4 validator doesn\u2019t, as ARIA is a new spec developed after HTML4. (Actually, it\u2019s more accurate to say that it doesn\u2019t validate your ARIA attributes, but it doesn\u2019t automatically report them as an error.)\n\nAnother advantage is that HTML5 allows tabindex as a global attribute (that is, on any element). Although originally designed as an accessibility bolt-on, I ordinarily advise you don\u2019t use it; a well-structured page should provide a logical tab order through links and form fields already.\n\nHowever, tabindex=\"-1\" is a legal value in HTML5 as it allows for the element to be programmatically focussable by JavaScript. It\u2019s also very useful for correcting a bug in Internet Explorer when used with a keyboard; in-page links go nowhere if the destination doesn\u2019t have a proprietary property called hasLayout set or a tabindex of -1.\n\nSo, whether it is the tool of Satan or yule of Santa, HTML5 is just around the corner. Some you can use now, and by the end of 2010 I predict you\u2019ll be able to use a whole lot more as new browser versions are released.", "2009", "Bruce Lawson", "brucelawson", "2009-12-05T00:00:00+00:00", "https://24ways.org/2009/html5-tool-of-satan-or-yule-of-santa/", "code"], [216, "Styling Components - Typed CSS With Stylable", "There\u2019s been a lot of debate recently about how best to style components for web apps so that styles don\u2019t accidentally \u2018leak\u2019 out of the component they\u2019re meant for, or clash with other styles on the page.\nElaborate CSS conventions have sprung up, such as OOCSS, SMACSS, BEM, ITCSS, and ECSS. These work well, but they are methodologies, and require everyone in the team to know them and follow them, which can be a difficult undertaking across large or distributed teams.\nOthers just give up on CSS and put all their styles in JavaScript. Now, I\u2019m not bashing JS, especially so close to its 22nd birthday, but CSS-in-JS has problems of its own. Browsers have 20 years experience in optimising their CSS engines, so JavaScript won\u2019t be as fast as using real CSS, and in any case, this requires waiting for JS to download, parse, execute then render the styles.\nThere\u2019s another problem with CSS-in-JS, too. Since Responsive Web Design hit the streets, most designers no longer make comps in Photoshop or its equivalents; instead, they write CSS. Why hire an expensive design professional and require them to learn a new way of doing their job? \nA recent thread on Twitter asked \u201cWhat\u2019s your biggest gripe with CSS-in-JS?\u201d, and the replies were illuminating: \u201cAlways having to remember to camelCase properties then spending 10min pulling hair out when you do forget\u201d, \u201cthe cryptic domain-specific languages that each of the frameworks do just ever so slightly differently\u201d, \u201cWhen I test look and feel in browser, then I copy paste from inspector, only to have to re-write it as a JSON object\u201d, \u201cLack of linting, autocomplete, and css plug-ins for colors/ incrementing/ etc\u201d. \nIf you\u2019re a developer, and you\u2019re still unconvinced, I challenge you to let designers change the font in your IDE to Zapf Chancery and choose a new colour scheme, simply because they like it better. Does that sound like fun? Will that boost your productivity? Thought not.\nSome chums at Wix Engineering and I wanted to see if we could square this circle. Wix-hosted sites have always used CSS-in-JS (the concept isn\u2019t new; it was in Netscape 4!) but that was causing performance problems. Could we somehow devise a method of extending CSS (like SASS and LESS do) that gives us styles that are guaranteed not to leak or clash, that is compatible with code editors\u2019 autocompletion, and which could be pre-processed at build time to valid, cross-browser, static CSS?\nAfter a few months and a few proofs of concept later (drumroll), yes \u2013 we could! We call it Stylable.\nIntroducing Stylable\nStylable is a CSS pre-processor, like SASS or LESS. It uses CSS syntax so all your development tools will work. At build time, the Stylable CSS extensions are transpiled to flat, valid, cross-browser vanilla CSS for maximum performance. There\u2019s quite a bit to it, and this is a short article, so let\u2019s look at the basic concepts.\nComponents all the way down\nStylable is designed for component-based systems. Imagine you have a Gallery component. Within that, there is a Navigation component (for example, containing a \u2018next\u2019, \u2018previous\u2019, \u2018show all thumbnails\u2019, and \u2018show all albums\u2019 controls), and within that there are NavButton components. Each component is discrete, used elsewhere in the system in different contexts, perhaps maintained by different team members or even different organisations \u2014 you can use Stylable to add a typed interface to non-Stylable component libraries, as well as using it to build an app from scratch.\nFirstly, Stylable will automatically namespace styles so they only apply inside that component, by rewriting them at build time with a unique (but human-readable) prefix. So, for example,\n
might be re-written as
. \nSo far, so BEM-like (albeit without the headache of remembering a convention). But what else can it do?\nCustom pseudo-elements\nAn important feature of Stylable is the ability to reach into a component and style it from the outside, without having to know about its internal structure. Let\u2019s see the guts of a simple JSX button component in the file button.jsx:\nrender () {\n return (\n \n );\n}\n(Note:className is the JSX way of setting a class on an element; this example uses React, but Stylable itself is framework-agnostic.)\nI style it using a Stylable stylesheet (the .st.css suffix tells the preprocessor to process this file):\n/* button.st.css */\n\n/* note that the root class is automatically placed on the root HTML \nelement by Stylable React integration */\n.root {\n background: #b0e0e6;\n}\n\n.icon {\n display: block; \n height: 2em;\n background-image: url('./assets/btnIcon.svg');\n}\n\n.label {\n font-size: 1.2em;\n color: rgba(81, 12, 68, 1.0);\n}\nNote that Stylable allows all the CSS that you know and love to be included. As Drew Powers wrote in his review:\n\nwith Stylable, you get CSS, and every part of CSS. This seems like a \u201cduh\u201d observation, but this is significant if you\u2019ve ever battled with a CSS-in-JS framework over a lost or \u201chacky\u201d implementation of a basic CSS feature.\n\nI can import my Button component into another component - this time, panel.jsx:\n/* panel.jsx */\nimport * as React from 'react';\nimport {properties, stylable} from 'wix-react-tools';\nimport {Button} from '../button';\nimport style from './panel.st.css';\n\nexport const Panel = stylable(style)(() => (\n
\n
\n));\nIn panel.st.css: \n/* panel.st.css */\n:import {\n -st-from: './button.st.css';\n -st-default: Button;\n}\n\n/* cancelBtn is of type Button */\n.cancelBtn {\n -st-extends: Button;\n background: cornflowerblue;\n}\n\n/* targets the label of